Anthropic CCA-F 試験概要:
| 認定ベンダー: | Anthropic |
|---|---|
| 試験名: | Claude Certified Architect – Foundations (CCA-F) |
| 試験番号: | CCA-F |
| 関連資格: | Claude Certified Architect |
| 出題数: | 60 |
| 受験料: | 99 USD(初期の無料パートナー枠適用後) |
| 合格点: | 720/1000 |
| 試験形式: | シナリオベース, 選択式 |
| 試験時間: | 120 分 |
| 認定の有効期間: | 公式には未規定 |
| 対応言語: | 英語 |
| サンプル問題: | Anthropic CCA-F サンプル問題 |
| 受験方法: | オンライン監視付き認定試験(シナリオベース、選択式)。通常、Anthropic パートナーまたは Anthropic Academy への登録を通じてアクセスします。 |
| 前提条件: | LLM API、プロンプトエンジニアリング、およびソフトウェア開発(Python または同等)に関する基本的な知識。Claude または LLM アプリケーションの開発経験が約6ヶ月以上あることが推奨されます。 |
| 公式シラバスのURL: | https://claude.com/partners |
Anthropic CCA-F 試験シラバストピック:
| セクション | 比重 | 目標 |
|---|---|---|
| トピック 1: ツール設計と MCP 統合 | 18% | - Model Context Protocol (MCP)
|
| トピック 2: プロンプトエンジニアリングと構造化出力 | 20% | - ツール拡張プロンプト
|
| トピック 3: コンテキスト管理と信頼性 | 15% | - コンテキストウィンドウの最適化
|
| トピック 4: エージェンティック・アーキテクチャとオーケストレーション | 27% | - マルチエージェント・オーケストレーション
|
| トピック 5: Claude Code の構成とワークフロー | 20% | - CI/CD とワークフローの統合
|
Anthropic Claude Certified Architect Foundations (CCA-F) 認定 CCA-F 試験問題:
問題 #1
Your multi-agent research pipeline crashed after processing12 of 28 documents. The web search agent had identified relevant sources, the document analyzer had partially completed extraction, and the synthesizer had begun pattern identification. You need to resume processing without repeating work or losing fidelity of prior findings. What state management approach best balances information fidelity with context efficiency when restoring agent state?
A. Index all agent outputs in a shared vector store. When resuming, each agent queries the store using semantic search to retrieve relevant prior findings.
B. Have each agent persist a structured export to a known location. On resume, the coordinator loads the manifest and injects relevant state into agent prompts.
C. Have each agent maintain its own persistent state file and reload it independently at the start of each session.
D. Persist the coordinator's conversation log containing all task delegations and responses, providing this to agents when resuming.
問題 #2
The coordinator provides detailed step-by-step instructions to the web search subagent, specifying exact search queries, source priorities, and date filters. Production monitoring reveals three issues: (1) the subagent reports "insufficient results" rather than trying alternative approaches when pre-specified searches fail, (2) research quality drops for emerging topics that don't match expected patterns, and (3) the subagent rarely surfaces valuable tangential sources.
What's the most effective way to improve subagent adaptability?
A. Specify research goals and quality criteria (coverage breadth, source diversity, recency) rather than procedural steps, letting the subagent determine its search strategy.
B. Remove procedural details entirely, delegating with simple goals like "research X thoroughly" and relying on the subagent's general capabilities.
C. Add explicit fallback directives to the detailed instructions: "If specified searches yield fewer than N results, attempt alternative query formulations before reporting failure."
D. Implement a topic classification step where the coordinator categorizes requests as "well-defined" or "exploratory" and uses different instruction styles for each category.
問題 #3
What is the PRIMARY purpose of few-shot prompting?
A. Increase model size.
B. Reduce token costs.
C. Encrypt prompts.
D. Demonstrate desired output patterns.
問題 #4
In production, final reports frequently contain claims without proper source attribution.
Investigation shows that while the web search and document analysis agents correctly attach citations to their outputs, the synthesis agent loses track of which sources support which conclusions when combining findings. What's the most effective architectural change?
A. Require all subagents to output structured claim-source mappings that the synthesis agent must preserve and merge when combining findings from multiple sources.
B. Add a verification step where the report generator uses semantic similarity matching against original sources to reconstruct which claims came from which documents.
C. Maintain complete transcripts of all subagent interactions and add a citation-resolution agent to analyze logs and determine attributions before report generation.
D. Have the coordinator inject source identifier prefixes into text before each handoff, then parse these prefixes at report generation to reconstruct citations.
問題 #5
Your MCP server implements a check_availability tool that queries an external calendar API.
During testing, you encounter three error conditions: (1) the tool is called with a malformed request missing the required user_email parameter, (2) the calendar API returns a 404 because the specified user doesn't exist in the calendar system, and (3) the calendar API returns a 503 because the service is temporarily unavailable. How should each error be reported according to MCP's error handling design?
A. Report error 1 as a JSON-RPC protocol error; report errors 2 and 3 as tool results with isError:
true.
B. Report all three as JSON-RPC protocol errors.
C. Report all three as tool results with isError: true.
D. Report errors 1 and 2 as JSON-RPC protocol errors; report error 3 as a tool result with isError:
true.
解説:
| 問題 #1 正解: B | 問題 #2 正解: A | 問題 #3 正解: D | 問題 #4 正解: A | 問題 #5 正解: A |














1467 お客様のコメント
品質保証JPexamはIT認定試験のシラバスに従って、試験問題の範囲を正確に絞って、的中率が99%の最新問題集を捧げます。
1年間の無料更新サービスJPexamは1年以内に問題集の無料更新サービスを提供し、お客様がいつでも最新版の問題集を持つことを保証いたします。もし試験の内容が変更されたら、弊社は直ちにお客様にお知らせします。それに、弊社の問題集が更新されたら、早速メールで最新バージョンを送付いたします。
全額返金JPexamの問題集を利用すると、短時間で勉強しても試験に合格できるのを保証いたします。試験に不合格になってしまった場合、弊社は全額返金いたします。(
ご購入前のお試しJPexamは問題集のサンプルを無料で提供いたします。ご購入前にサンプルを試用して製品の品質を確認することができます。ご遠慮なく利用してください。
