SAP C_TS452 試験概要:

SAP C_TS452 試験シラバストピック:

SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Sourcing and Procurement 認定 C_TS452 試験問題：

1. A consumer durables company is validating centrally governed sourcing agreements in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for a region that is transitioning from locally negotiated purchasing into a shared sourcing model. Category managers can create and release the agreements, and buyers can see the suppliers in the purchasing apps. However, when purchase orders are created for one product family, the system proposes the supplier but does not apply the intended pricing and sourcing conditions from the released agreement. For another product family under the same sourcing program, the agreement is applied correctly.
The sourcing director wants the issue corrected without allowing regional buyers to override pricing manually. The fix must remain within standard clean-core design and support a controlled transition from local sourcing behavior to the shared model.
What is the most appropriate first action?

A) Verify whether the released agreement is correctly bound to the affected product-family scope and purchasing conditions used during PO creation.
B) Allow regional buyers to enter the correct pricing manually until the shared sourcing model is fully adopted.
C) Rebuild the supplier master because missing agreement pricing usually indicates incomplete supplier-contact data.
D) Delay shared sourcing for the affected product family and continue local price negotiation for the current cycle.

2. A sourcing and procurement program is running final governed regression in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after a controlled transport moved approval-related configuration and refreshed validation content into pre-production. Manual requisitioning, purchase-order creation, and invoice verification still work in SAP Fiori. However, one automated approval package now fails at startup because the environment log shows that the required release configuration is active, but the package is still referencing an outdated execution-context profile for one organizational scope.
A comparable package for another scope runs successfully in the same tenant. The release manager wants a targeted correction before sign-off. No broad fallback access may be granted, and no test-only exception is allowed because the production-aligned lifecycle model must remain controlled and audit-ready.
Which action should the consultant take first?

A) Compare the transported organizational-scope assignment and execution-context profile referenced by the affected approval package in pre-production.
B) Restore the earlier broader regression setup so the failed package can run before the sign-off deadline.
C) Mark the failed package as acceptable because another approval package still works in the same environment.
D) Rebuild the approval rules because startup failures usually indicate incomplete release-process design.

3. A company is preparing its first integrated purchasing test in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after loading procurement master data for a newly activated plant. Users can create material master records and supplier-related purchasing data, and requisitions can be entered without error. However, when buyers attempt to create purchase orders for the new plant, the system rejects the documents for that plant only, while the same purchasing process works in an already-live plant within the same company structure.
The implementation lead wants a correction that is transportable and suitable for rollout governance. The team must not create plant-specific custom logic or temporary exceptions because the design is intended to scale to additional plants in later phases.
What is the best first action?

A) Add a plant-specific enhancement to redirect purchasing documents to a fallback organizational unit.
B) Rebuild supplier master data for all plants because plant-specific document rejection usually indicates supplier duplication issues.
C) Confirm that the new plant is correctly assigned within the required procurement organizational structure and is usable in the purchasing process scope.
D) Instruct buyers to create the purchase orders under the existing live plant and later transfer stock internally after go-live.

4. A household-products distributor is migrating branch replenishment from a spreadsheet-based reorder list into SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition. Standard planning now generates proposals for most stock items, and buyers have started downstream procurement testing. However, a group of seasonal consumables transferred from the legacy branch model generates proposals in one branch but not in another, even though recent consumption and stock thresholds indicate that both branches should receive replenishment suggestions. Materials created directly in the new planning model behave consistently across branches.
The program sponsor wants the spreadsheet retired on schedule. The team cannot extend parallel manual planning beyond the current phase, and no custom planning logic may be added because future branches must adopt the same standard model.
Which action is most appropriate?

A) Ask the affected branch to continue using the spreadsheet reorder list until all branches complete modernization.
B) Rebuild downstream supplier assignments because missing proposals usually originate in source-maintenance differences.
C) Verify whether the transferred seasonal consumables are consistently assigned the required branch-level planning parameters and scope controls for standard proposal generation.
D) Increase the planning-run frequency in the branch without proposals so it catches up with the branch where output exists.

5. A sourcing and procurement program is preparing its final controlled test cycle in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition before pre-production sign-off. Manual execution of requisitioning, purchasing, and goods-receipt scenarios still works in SAP Fiori. However, one automated validation package for procurement approvals now stops at the initial execution check because the environment reports that the required approval configuration content is not active for that package. Other approval-related packages continue to run successfully in the same tenant.
The problem started after a transport sequence that included workflow-related configuration activation. The release manager wants a precise correction without redesigning the approved procurement process. The team must avoid temporary test-only logic and keep the lifecycle model production-aligned because the same transport path will be used for cutover readiness.

A) Verify whether the transported approval-related configuration content was correctly activated and bound for the affected package in the target environment.
B) Ask testers to execute the package manually and ignore the automated validation issue until after cutover rehearsal.
C) Mark the package as optional because other approval tests still prove that the overall tenant is stable enough for sign-off.
D) Rebuild the buyer approval rules because workflow packages that fail at startup usually indicate business-process redesign gaps.

質問と回答：