SAP C_TS452_2601 試験概要:
| 認定ベンダー: | SAP |
|---|---|
| 試験名: | SAP認定資格 - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition 調達・購買 |
| 試験番号: | C_TS452_2601 |
| 試験時間: | 180 分 |
| 対応言語: | 英語 |
| 試験形式: | 参照資料持ち込み可, システムベース評価, 実稼働SAP環境での実務課題 |
| 受験料: | USD 578 |
| 認定の有効期間: | 12か月 |
| 出題数: | システム上での課題形式（設問数は固定されていません） |
| 関連資格: | SAP認定アプリケーションアソシエイト - SAP S/4HANA 調達・購買 |
| 合格点: | 76% |
| 推奨トレーニング: | TS452 - SAP S/4HANAにおける調達・購買 応用編 TS450 - SAP S/4HANAにおける調達・購買 基礎編 |
| 受験申し込み: | SAP Learning Hub 認定資格申込みサイト Pearson VUE |
| サンプル問題: | SAP C_TS452_2601 サンプル問題 |
| 受験方法: | オンライン監督付き受験またはPearson VUE試験会場での受験。実稼働SAP S/4HANA環境にて実施 |
| 前提条件: | TS450およびTS452トレーニングコースの受講修了を推奨。SAP S/4HANAの調達業務に関する実務経験 |
| 公式シラバスのURL: | https://learning.sap.com/certification/c_ts452_2601 |
SAP C_TS452_2601 試験シラバストピック:
| セクション | 比重 | 目標 |
|---|---|---|
| 企業構造とマスタデータ | 15% - 20% | - 企業構造の定義と設定 - ビジネスパートナー、品目マスタ、購買情報レコードの管理 - 勘定決定と評価の設定 |
| 在庫管理 | 15% - 20% | - 特殊調達タイプの管理：外注加工、委託販売、パイプライン調達 - 入出庫処理と在庫移動の実施 - 実地棚卸手続きの実施 |
| 消費量計画と調達元決定 | 10% - 15% | - 調達元リストと割当計画の定義 - 仕入先評価機能の設定 - 資材所要量計画（MRP）方式とロットサイズの設定 |
| ロジスティクス請求書照合 | 15% - 20% | - 自動請求書保留・解除機能の設定 - 財務会計モジュールとの連携 - 請求書の処理と差異への対応 |
| 調達プロセス | 20% - 25% | - 柔軟な業務フローとリリース戦略の設定 - 調達から支払いまでの一連の業務フローの実行 - 購買依頼、発注書、契約の管理 |
SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Sourcing and Procurement 認定 C_TS452_2601 試験問題：
問題 #1
A chemical distributor is validating split valuation and procurement posting behavior in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after moving from a template that previously used a simplified stock model. Purchase orders for the affected raw materials can be created, and goods receipts are recorded without interruption. However, when the warehouse team posts receipts for one valuation scenario, the material documents are created but follow-on financial postings fail validation in the test monitor for only the affected valuation path. Standard goods receipts for other materials in the same plant complete successfully.
The implementation lead wants the root cause corrected before the next rollout wave. The team must keep the standard configuration model, avoid temporary manual finance postings, and stay aligned with clean core governance because additional plants will inherit the same template.
What is the best next step to address the upstream issue?
A. Suppress the finance validation checks temporarily so the logistics team can complete receipt testing on schedule.
B. Ask the warehouse team to receive the material under a working valuation path and reclassify it later after go-live.
C. Review whether the valuation-related customizing and account determination settings are correctly aligned for the affected material usage and organizational scope.
D. Recreate the purchase orders with a different purchasing group because follow-on posting failures often originate in buyer settings.
問題 #2
A spare-parts business is introducing standard replenishment planning in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition while gradually retiring a legacy planning spreadsheet used by regional planners. Initial planning runs now generate proposals for most stock items, and downstream purchasing tests are progressing. However, one regional planner reports that materials transferred from the legacy spreadsheet process into the new planning scope are still excluded from replenishment proposals, even though current stock levels and recent consumption would normally justify planning output.
Other materials created directly in the new model are processed correctly. The program manager wants the issue fixed before the spreadsheet is formally retired. No custom planning logic may be introduced, and the correction must support a controlled modernization path for later regional adoption.
What should the consultant check first?
A. Rebuild the purchasing source assignments because replenishment gaps usually originate in supplier-selection logic.
B. Verify whether the transferred materials carry the planning-relevant master-data settings and scope assignments required for standard proposal generation.
C. Ask planners to continue entering manual replenishment requests for transferred materials until all regions abandon the spreadsheet.
D. Increase the overall planning run frequency so transferred materials are recalculated more often than newly created materials.
問題 #3
<strong>CHALLENGE 1 — Assortment Treatment Consistency for Live Replenishment</strong> A fulfillment lead argues that time-sensitive replenishment should allow local assortment-treatment choices whenever the shared path does not appear quickly enough during peak trading. The governance office wants the current live model to stay close to the template used for future regional adoption. Which action is most appropriate?
A. Delay assortment-treatment validation until all comparative records in the connected on-premise context are no longer visible
B. Remove festival-season replenishment from hypercare scope and validate only routine merchandise demand
C. Preserve common assortment-treatment discipline and confirm whether representative live demand enters purchasing with aligned preparation
D. Permit local assortment-treatment choices for all urgent replenishment because sell-through speed is more important during hypercare
問題 #4
A medical-device distributor is validating stock posting after quality-related receipt processing in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition. Goods receipts can be posted for incoming procurement documents, and warehouse users can review inventory positions successfully. For most material groups, the stock moves into the expected usable state after inspection completion. However, for one regulated material group in a newly migrated warehouse, the system keeps the stock in an intermediate status and blocks the expected follow-on availability update.
The same users can complete the process for other material groups in the same warehouse, and the same regulated material group works correctly in an already stabilized warehouse. The migration lead wants the issue resolved before mock cutover. Manual stock reclassification is not allowed, and the shared warehouse template must remain standard for upcoming site migrations.
What is the most appropriate first action?
A. Check whether the migrated warehouse has material-group-specific control or status settings preventing the standard transition from receipt completion to usable stock.
B. Ask warehouse users to transfer the regulated stock through the stabilized warehouse until the migration program is complete.
C. Broaden warehouse authorization so users can force the stock into the usable state during follow-on processing.
D. Recreate the goods receipts because blocked availability transitions usually begin with incorrect receiving transactions.
問題 #5
<strong>CHALLENGE 2 — Approval Path Stability for Grounded-Aircraft Procurement</strong> A project reviewer notes that urgent aircraft-support orders can be executed successfully in two ways: one route follows the common approval structure, and the other uses locally shortened release handling. The program asks which route should guide rollout readiness. Which answer is best?
A. Use the shortened release path for rotables and the common path for expendables
B. Keep both release paths available so each location can choose based on operational pressure
C. Use the common approval structure unless it prevents urgent orders from meeting operational turnaround expectations
D. Use the faster route because any method that restores aircraft support quickly is acceptable during rollout
解説：
| 問題 #1 正解： C | 問題 #2 正解： B | 問題 #3 正解： C | 問題 #4 正解： A | 問題 #5 正解： C |
851 お客様のコメント
品質保証JPexamはIT認定試験のシラバスに従って、試験問題の範囲を正確に絞って、的中率が99％の最新問題集を捧げます。
1年間の無料更新サービスJPexamは1年以内に問題集の無料更新サービスを提供し、お客様がいつでも最新版の問題集を持つことを保証いたします。もし試験の内容が変更されたら、弊社は直ちにお客様にお知らせします。それに、弊社の問題集が更新されたら、早速メールで最新バージョンを送付いたします。
全額返金JPexamの問題集を利用すると、短時間で勉強しても試験に合格できるのを保証いたします。試験に不合格になってしまった場合、弊社は全額返金いたします。(
ご購入前のお試しJPexamは問題集のサンプルを無料で提供いたします。ご購入前にサンプルを試用して製品の品質を確認することができます。ご遠慮なく利用してください。
